Buenas, les traigo un poco de lo que encontré de la XZ-1, una excelente camara en el mismo rango de mercado que las ya conocidas G12 y S95 de Canon y Lumix LX5.
Especificaciones generales :
# High Sensitivity 10MP CCD sensor
# 28-112mm equivalent lens
# F1.8-2.5 maximum aperture# CCD-shift image stabilization
# Twin control dials, including one around the lens
# ISO 100-6400
# New TruPic V processor (as used in the company's PEN series)
# Large 3.0" 621k (VGA equivalent) OLED display
# 720p movie mode (30 fps in Motion JPEG format)
# Micro HDMI connector
# 6 Art Filters (As per the PEN series)
# In-camera RAW conversion
# Built-in flash, hotshoe and remote flash control
# Built-in ND filter
Revison de DPReview, obtuvo un 74% y un hermoso Gold Award!
Conclusiones :
The XZ-1 is a rather late addition to the burgeoning enthusiast compact sector and, in some respects, a surprising one - the XZ-1's potential market can't help but overlap with the E-PL2's, to an extent. But it's a very welcome addition to what's become an exciting part of the market for the keen photographer. This now includes a fairly broad range of cameras, varying from the 'point-and-shoot with manual-override' of Canon's S95 up to the big, bulky, button-and-dial-covered Nikon P7000 and Canon G12, via the middle-ground option offered by Panasonic's LX5 and Samsung's TL500 (EX1).
The XZ-1 steps in towards the more compact end of this spectrum and does a great job of balancing flexibility with pocketabilty. Not only does it offer a very versatile lens range (28-112mm equivalent), but it does so with a maximum aperture that can't be matched. At F1.8-2.5 it's brighter at every point than either the Panasonic or Samsung, and is in a completely different league to the F2.0-4.9 offered by the Canon S95 to which it's otherwise so similar.
XZ-1 vs s95 vs G12 vs LX5, usando las imagenes de estudio de dpreview, interesante tambien.
Conclusiones :
Well, I can admit that the previous article’s conclusion was only valid under some circumstances. For web use, in fact all of these cameras are pretty decent. I would personally be inclined to the G12 or Nikon P7000, since I need more reach than the street shooters have available. But of course, I am into the long zooms so I toil away with the F300EXR.
For enlargement or cropping with jpegs, I think I was right about the Oly. Look elsewhere. The F300EXR that I use looks as bad as the Oly at 100%, but I am quite sure that have no illusions about its ability to print large or crop.
If you are a RAW shooter, the Oly’s jpeg engine should not hold you back. The speed of the camera’s lens in undeniable. The DPReview tests don’t look great at high ISO, but run through ACR and Topaz Denoise and even high ISO shots might be pretty good. And with the speed of the lens, ISO 1600 is like ISO 6400 on the G12 …
Y un par de videos de revisiones de youtube interesantes :
Saludos y espero que les guste.